Subscriber Services
Subscriber Services
Subscriber Services
Subscriber Services
Weather
Complete Forecast
Search  Recent News  Archives  Web   for     Welcome Steve
My Classifieds | My Account | Sign Out

PARTNERS


PHOTO STORE

»  Buy photos
High-quality prints of July's Live 8 concert, historic sites and events, cityscapes, sports venues and more.

»  See a photo you want?

»  Photos of the day


»  The People Paper Podcast

Attention Freelance Writers:
Click for Copyright Class Action Settlement Info
Sunday, Nov 27, 2005
  email this    print this   
Posted on Sun, Nov. 27, 2005
Click here to find out more!

A better traffic system would help conserve fuel


Sidney B. Kurtz

writes from Pennsauken

The President has called on us - the little guys like you and me - to conserve fuel. Let's set aside for the moment our views on corporation profits and price-gouging at the pumps, and assume that every homeowner and apartment dweller has obeyed conservation guidelines (an unlikely scenario) and has done everything possible, so far as their finances permit, to seal themselves off from the ravages of nature.

So far, so good. But when the President calls on us to cut back on using our most precious material possession - our cars - that's too much. We seldom leave home without them. We baby them, we wash and wax them, and we change the oil regularly. Are we spoiled? You bet. But don't blame us. As fortunate citizens in this land of plenty, it's part of our lifestyle to drive rather than walk.

However, we could make changes to save fuel - without sacrificing our cars. If we can win a two-ocean war; if we can send men to the moon; if we can land rovers on Mars and ram explosives into the head of a comet, then we are certainly capable of improving our roads and having an efficient traffic system here on Earth.

One of the worst fuel offenders is the traffic light itself. There it sits, out of sync with the previous light. We have the ability to time traffic lights, so why hasn't it been done? Too expensive? So is that rocket waiting to burn millions of pounds of fuel in less time than it takes us to get ready to go to our jobs.

In addition, that red light could be one of the many "dumb" lights that turn red even if no cars are waiting at the intersection. Nevertheless, cars must wait for that light to change, all the while engines are idling, burning fuel and sending poisons into the atmosphere.

Traffic backups are notorious gas guzzlers. Besides staggering our working hours - a Band-Aid that has been timidly tried before - there are other methods of alleviating the massive parking lots that pop up on our highways. Overpasses and underpasses are excellent traffic movers, and so are medium-length express roads with appropriate exits. Also expensive? So is our war in Iraq.

It costs nothing to turn off your engine while you go into a convenience store or your local bank branch, so why don't more people do it? One guess is to keep the car cool in the summer and warm in the winter. The "no idling" signs posted at various locations are an excellent idea, but are often ignored.

Recently, I was waiting in my car for my lady friend, who was making some purchases in the Dollar Store. It was a pleasant day, and I was comfortable with the car windows open. The car next to me had all windows closed. Although the glass was tinted, I could see that there was no driver but two people were talking in the backseat. The engine was idling. I could feel the heat radiating from under the hood, and I could smell the exhaust.

I was in that parking spot for 20 minutes. When we pulled away, the other car was still idling! One might say that these are singular examples in local areas, but multiply these by thousands of "local" areas nationwide, and you have a major waste of precious fuel - fuel that won't last forever.

Let's leave some for future generations, folks.


Click here to find out more!
  email this    print this